Получила очередное newsletter от Peter Bollard & Associates, забавная инфа:
Too many cooks – or why TRA eliminated Pathway D
At a Migration Institute of Australia seminar on 28 September 2007 a speaker from Trades Recognition Australia provided fascinating statistics to explain why TRA abolished Pathway D (skills assessment in a trade based on 6 or 7 years work experience rather than formal training or qualifications).
The figures included the following;
Occupation Applications received in the year ended 30 June 2006
Applications received in the year ended 30 June 2007
Hairdresser 2736 6285
Cook 2463 6541
Figures for source countries of applicants for trade’s skills assessments were also supplied with India having had an enormous increase in applicants from 6926 applicants during the year ended 30 June 2006 increasing to 14614 applicants during the year ended 30 June 2007.
It is understood that DIAC is concerned at the number of applications that included work references that could not be verified and that many applicants are currently being investigated because of this issue.
In this regard it is important to note that as a “time of decision” requirement DIAC can refuse a General Skilled Migration application if information supplied in respect of a skills assessment was false or misleading in a material particular.
Too many cooks – or why TRA eliminated Pathway D
At a Migration Institute of Australia seminar on 28 September 2007 a speaker from Trades Recognition Australia provided fascinating statistics to explain why TRA abolished Pathway D (skills assessment in a trade based on 6 or 7 years work experience rather than formal training or qualifications).
The figures included the following;
Occupation Applications received in the year ended 30 June 2006
Applications received in the year ended 30 June 2007
Hairdresser 2736 6285
Cook 2463 6541
Figures for source countries of applicants for trade’s skills assessments were also supplied with India having had an enormous increase in applicants from 6926 applicants during the year ended 30 June 2006 increasing to 14614 applicants during the year ended 30 June 2007.
It is understood that DIAC is concerned at the number of applications that included work references that could not be verified and that many applicants are currently being investigated because of this issue.
In this regard it is important to note that as a “time of decision” requirement DIAC can refuse a General Skilled Migration application if information supplied in respect of a skills assessment was false or misleading in a material particular.
Comment