Tweet
Вводные: подались мы в августе 2007 года, в декабре 2008 прошли медицину + полицию по запросу, в августе 2009 получили спонсорство WA. Не в CSL. Никакими способами не может добиться от агента ответов на наши вопросы (а знает ли DIAC о спонсорстве?, а что с нашей медициной? и пр.). Помощником агента был сделан стандартный запрос 4 декабря, на что получили такой ответ:
«Thank you for your enquiry regarding the application of Mr -------. The
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, Senator Chris Evans, has set new
priority processing arrangements for certain Skilled Migration visas.
These arrangements are designed to better address the needs of industry by
targeting skills in critical need across a number of sectors. The new
priority processing Direction commenced on 23 September 2009.
The Direction applies to applications in the pipeline that have not been
finalised and to applications lodged with the Department of Immigration and
Citizenship on or after 23 September 2009.
The priority processing arrangements apply to the following visas from 23
September 2009:
• Employer Nomination Scheme (ENS);
• Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme (RSMS); and
• General Skilled Migration (GSM) visas except for:
o Skilled – Recognised Graduate Subclass 476;
o Skilled – Designated Area – Sponsored (Residence) Subclass 883;
o Skilled – Regional Subclass 887.
Under the Ministerial Direction the following processing priorities (with
the highest priority listed first) apply:
1. applications from persons who are employer sponsored under the ENS
and the RSMS;
2. applications from persons who are nominated by a State/Territory
government and have nominated an occupation on the Critical Skills List
(CSL);
3. applications from persons who are sponsored by family and whose
occupation is listed on the CSL;
4. applications from persons who are neither nominated nor sponsored but
who have nominated an occupation on the CSL;
5. applications from persons who are nominated by a State/Territory
government and have not nominated an occupation on the CSL;
6. (i) applications from persons whose occupations are listed on the
Migration Occupations in Demand List; and
(ii) applications from persons who are sponsored by family and have not
nominated an occupation on the CSL;
7. all other applications are to be processed in the order in which they
are received.
As Mr -----'s nominated occupation is not on the CSL and he is not
sponsored by an employer, the processing of this visa application will not
be finalised until those visa applications which meet the higher processing
priorities are finalised.
This priority processing Direction supersedes all previous Directions and
applies to all unfinalised GSM applications with the exception of the
subclass 476, 883 and 887 visas identified above. This Direction applies
irrespective of whether the application is newly lodged, has been assessed
and is in the final stages of processing, or is nominated by a State or
Territory government or family sponsor.
Applicants with a nominated occupation not on the CSL who have applied for
an offshore GSM visa before the end of 2009, are unlikely to have their
visa finalised before the end of 2012.
If he has been requested to undergo health and character checks but has not
yet initiated these, the applicants should now not proceed until a further
request is made by the Department.
If they have already undergone their health and character checks, these
should be forwarded to the Department. However, please note that
processing will not proceed until further notice.
To be granted a visa this program year, Mr ----- will need to meet visa
requirements and be sponsored by an employer or have a nominated occupation
listed on the CSL.
If Mr ----- wishes to have his application processed as a priority, he
may wish to consider seeking an Australian employer to formally sponsor
him.
Yours sincerely,»
Такое ощущение, что тот, кто ответил ЭТО - не офицер, а просто какой – то чижик по связям с общественностью.
Кто – нибудь получал такой же ответ «ни о чём» в свете последних событий?
И ещё хочу спросить: а кто-нибудь отправлял Post-Lodgement Enquiry Form в обход агента? Насколько я понимаю, помощник агента может отправлять стандартные запросы, а вот сам агент может задавать разные вопросы и прочее. По неведомой причине агент нестандартный запрос не отправляет. Хочется кинуть камень в болото. Кто-то делал такое? Можно ли это делать? И какие бывают последствия?
Буду очень благодарна за ответы. Можно и в личку.
«Thank you for your enquiry regarding the application of Mr -------. The
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, Senator Chris Evans, has set new
priority processing arrangements for certain Skilled Migration visas.
These arrangements are designed to better address the needs of industry by
targeting skills in critical need across a number of sectors. The new
priority processing Direction commenced on 23 September 2009.
The Direction applies to applications in the pipeline that have not been
finalised and to applications lodged with the Department of Immigration and
Citizenship on or after 23 September 2009.
The priority processing arrangements apply to the following visas from 23
September 2009:
• Employer Nomination Scheme (ENS);
• Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme (RSMS); and
• General Skilled Migration (GSM) visas except for:
o Skilled – Recognised Graduate Subclass 476;
o Skilled – Designated Area – Sponsored (Residence) Subclass 883;
o Skilled – Regional Subclass 887.
Under the Ministerial Direction the following processing priorities (with
the highest priority listed first) apply:
1. applications from persons who are employer sponsored under the ENS
and the RSMS;
2. applications from persons who are nominated by a State/Territory
government and have nominated an occupation on the Critical Skills List
(CSL);
3. applications from persons who are sponsored by family and whose
occupation is listed on the CSL;
4. applications from persons who are neither nominated nor sponsored but
who have nominated an occupation on the CSL;
5. applications from persons who are nominated by a State/Territory
government and have not nominated an occupation on the CSL;
6. (i) applications from persons whose occupations are listed on the
Migration Occupations in Demand List; and
(ii) applications from persons who are sponsored by family and have not
nominated an occupation on the CSL;
7. all other applications are to be processed in the order in which they
are received.
As Mr -----'s nominated occupation is not on the CSL and he is not
sponsored by an employer, the processing of this visa application will not
be finalised until those visa applications which meet the higher processing
priorities are finalised.
This priority processing Direction supersedes all previous Directions and
applies to all unfinalised GSM applications with the exception of the
subclass 476, 883 and 887 visas identified above. This Direction applies
irrespective of whether the application is newly lodged, has been assessed
and is in the final stages of processing, or is nominated by a State or
Territory government or family sponsor.
Applicants with a nominated occupation not on the CSL who have applied for
an offshore GSM visa before the end of 2009, are unlikely to have their
visa finalised before the end of 2012.
If he has been requested to undergo health and character checks but has not
yet initiated these, the applicants should now not proceed until a further
request is made by the Department.
If they have already undergone their health and character checks, these
should be forwarded to the Department. However, please note that
processing will not proceed until further notice.
To be granted a visa this program year, Mr ----- will need to meet visa
requirements and be sponsored by an employer or have a nominated occupation
listed on the CSL.
If Mr ----- wishes to have his application processed as a priority, he
may wish to consider seeking an Australian employer to formally sponsor
him.
Yours sincerely,»
Такое ощущение, что тот, кто ответил ЭТО - не офицер, а просто какой – то чижик по связям с общественностью.
Кто – нибудь получал такой же ответ «ни о чём» в свете последних событий?
И ещё хочу спросить: а кто-нибудь отправлял Post-Lodgement Enquiry Form в обход агента? Насколько я понимаю, помощник агента может отправлять стандартные запросы, а вот сам агент может задавать разные вопросы и прочее. По неведомой причине агент нестандартный запрос не отправляет. Хочется кинуть камень в болото. Кто-то делал такое? Можно ли это делать? И какие бывают последствия?
Буду очень благодарна за ответы. Можно и в личку.
тоже нифига писать не желает, послали сами стандартный PLE...вот сидит,ждем-с...
Comment