Tweet
Можно это, конечно, запостить и в тему "IELTS", но по 47SK наверно актуальнее, т.к. у людеи здесь уже были такие вопросы. Недавно наш Высший Суд постановил, что НЕЛЬЗЯ комбинировать результаты двух разных тестов-хотя это и так было понятно:
High Court rules that a section of the Migration Act is invalid but student still fails in IELTS test appeal
The High Court has ruled that Section 486A of the Migration Act, which imposed a time limit on appeals to the High Court in the original jurisdiction of the Court, was invalid.
However the overseas student who brought the action was still unsuccessful in his main claim relating to the IELTS test.
The student had applied for a Subclass 880 visa but had been unable to obtain a score of 6 in each of the 4 IELTS test subjects in a single IELTS test.
The student argued that he should be allowed to “combine” the results of two separate IELTS tests but the High Court rejected this argument.
Bodruddaza v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2007] HCA 14 (18 April 2007)
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/c...t/2007/14.html
High Court rules that a section of the Migration Act is invalid but student still fails in IELTS test appeal
The High Court has ruled that Section 486A of the Migration Act, which imposed a time limit on appeals to the High Court in the original jurisdiction of the Court, was invalid.
However the overseas student who brought the action was still unsuccessful in his main claim relating to the IELTS test.
The student had applied for a Subclass 880 visa but had been unable to obtain a score of 6 in each of the 4 IELTS test subjects in a single IELTS test.
The student argued that he should be allowed to “combine” the results of two separate IELTS tests but the High Court rejected this argument.
Bodruddaza v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2007] HCA 14 (18 April 2007)
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/c...t/2007/14.html
Comment