Объявление

Collapse
No announcement yet.

My essay, проверьте, покритикуйте! Спасибо!

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Время
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
    To what extent do you agree or disagree ?


    Today, there are a lot of Universities which provide a great number of faculties for students. It is known fact that some subjects attract more men while women prefer to study another ones. It is disagreed that the quantity of male and female students entering Universities should be equal in every subject. This will be shown by analyzing what can be happen in this way.

    The first major negative aspect of this is that male and female students have different interests at all. For example, about 85 per cent of student studying maths or computer science are male ones. At this time, there are about 90 per cent of female students who learn biology or sociology against 10 per cent of male ones. When looking at this example, there is no doubt that if the number of male and female students was equal, a lot of student would not be interested in their learning subject. As a result, we might have had many weak specialists nowadays.

    The second possible problem is that many young people will not just graduate from Universities at all. For example, it may be possible if there is no available places for male students in the subject like maths, but there are a lot of ones for female students. This example makes it clear that a huge number of male students will not even manage to enter the University. Following that, all these students will not obtain any degree and the high education level will be decreased significantly.

    After analyzing these facts, it is clear that making an equal number of male and female students in every subject in Universities will cause terrible outcomes (results) in education system. It is expected that similar restrictions will never be approved by Universities in future.

    Comment


    • Сообщение от eskape
      Жду критики

      [b] While it cannot be 100 per cent proven that TV itself impacts watcher’s health, it is undoubtful that «beer, chair and football» is not a lifestyle which could be recommended by doctors.

      viewer's health, not "watcher's"

      viewer - telezritel'

      listener - radioslushatel'
      Здесь небо ясно и яро, Здесь воздух чист и светел,
      Тобой здесь дышит сам ветер, Команданте Че Гевара
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSRVtlTwFs8

      Comment


      • И ещё одно в догонку. Покритикуйте пожалуйста.

        News editors decide to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported?


        Within the past 30 years, the world has changed significantly and news on television or in newspapers have changed as well. Some people believe that we obtain only negative news while some refute it. These points of view will be discussed in this order.

        On the one hand, modern media sources broadcast, especially television, only bad news in general. For example, we learn about wars, some disasters, someone's death or local problems in some country. It is obvious when looking at this example that people get almost negative news only. Moreover, there is the fact that bad news attract more people than good ones. As a result, the news programs have a high rating and therefore earns more money. Thus, there is a clear link between bad news and money.

        On the other hand, every news program finishes with a good news. For instance, they tell us about some progress in the space or holidays in some country. Thanks to this, they try to tell us that everything is not so awful as we could imagine. When looking at this example, it is clear that news editors do not allow to decrease the rating of the news program and do not lose its auditory at the same time. Unfortunately, if more good news were reported it would attract less people to these news programs than now.

        Consequently, after analyzing these facts, it is clear that good news will not bring a huge income. Thus, the argument that it would be better if more positive news was reported can not be realized.

        Comment


        • Опять прошу Вашей помощи. Пожалуйста, прокомментируйте моё эссе.
          Откликнувшимся - заранее спасибо.


          Popular hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashions than an indication of what individuals really what to do in their spare time.
          To what extend do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer.


          A lot of people are of the opinion the the reason to chose a hobby is just a personal attitude. Others, however, disagree and argue that nowadays things of interest depend on modern trends. This essay looks at some arguments for and against this opinions.

          The reasons why people think that choice of hobby depend on fashion are obvious. The first thing that should be noted that today there are a lot of spare-time activities that definitely just parts of tendency. For example, there are a lot of pop-stars' fans. The one pop-singer is changed by the other very often, so and the fans change their music preferences very often. Second, a lot of people do not have permanent hobbies whole their lives. For instance, many of my friends have changed their interests several times and, I believe, because of new popular activities. In addition, young people are highly depend trends. If you contact with them, you may feel that everything, including the hobbies, is changing dramatically.

          On the other hand, there are strong reasons, why we can think that hobbies are just personal choice. First of all, still there are a lot of activities that cannot be called “modern”. From the real life we can see that a lot of people collect postcards and stamps now. Second, often favorite activities shared between parents and their children. My brother, for example, likes go fishing. In our childhood our father and he used to go fishing together, that is why my brother still like doing this. Last, but not least, some people event create new hobbies. A good example of this is my friends who developed a street quiz game and like to play it in their free time.

          To summarize, in my opinion, due to a number of strong reasons, people do what they really prefer to do in their leisure time.

          314 слов.

          Comment


          • Сообщение от slav
            И ещё одно в догонку. Покритикуйте пожалуйста.

            News editors decide to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported?


            Within the past 30 years, the world has changed significantly and news on television or in newspapers have changed as well. Some people believe that we obtain (1) only negative news while some refute (2) it. These points of view will be discussed in this order.

            On the (3) one hand, modern media sources broadcast, especially television, only bad news in general. For example, we learn about wars, some disasters, someone's death or local problems in some country. It is obvious when looking at this example that people get almost negative news only. Moreover, there is the fact that bad news attract more people than good ones. As a result, the news programs have a high rating and therefore earns (4) more money. Thus, there is a clear link between bad news and money.

            On the other hand, every news program finishes with a good news. For instance, they tell us about some progress in the space or holidays in some country. Thanks to this, they try to tell us that everything is not so awful as we could imagine. When looking at this example, it is clear that news editors do not allow to decrease the rating of the news program and do not lose its auditory at the same time. Unfortunately, if more good news were reported it would attract less people to these news programs than now.

            Consequently, after analyzing these facts, it is clear that good news will not bring a huge income. Thus, the argument that it would be better if more positive news was reported can not be realized (5).
            Отстраняясь от точки зрения, по языку Оч. хор, поэтому критика будет изощеренной.
            1- obtain означает получение собственными силами, получение от кого-то скорее receive
            2- refute - юридический термин и высокий штиль (отказ с наличием доказательной базы неправоты оппонента). Поскольку английский язык все таки сутяжный, терминов для отказа и несогласия с их смысловыми оттенками просто море. Я бы написал попроще, disagree. Если была мысль использовать "умные" (т.е. редкоиспользуемые) слова, то challenge.
            3 - on one hand без The. устойчивая фраза
            4 - earn множественное число без S (programs ... earn)
            5 - argument -- realized не бьется. Я бы сказал что argument ... has no basis.

            Realize (кстати - Zе - американизм, но за это оценки не снижают) = одна из самых распространенных калек с русского. Реализовать в русском означает создание чего-то, обычно нематериального момента (проекта, желания), в коммерции - продажу. В английском это означает придти к пониманию, как правило неожиданно для себя (I just realized I have to work this weekend) или получение материальной выгоды (realize some gain, realize interest on deposit) в бухгалтерско-финансовом смысле (unrealized gain/loss - курсовая прибыль/убыток, realized gain/loss - суммовая прибыль/убыток)

            еще - не освещен вопрос из задания о возникновении привычки к плохим новостям. Не знаю снижают ли за это оценку.
            NI Traktor | NI Maschine | Ecler EVO5 :)
            Leukaemia sucks!

            Comment


            • Прошу проверить эссе

              In what way has IT changed work and working practice in the past 10 years.

              Last decade brought us enormous innovation in sphere of computers and the Internet. Scientific progress dramatically modified methods of our working process. This essay will look at some benefits and disadvantages of these modifications.

              There are many advantages of using information technologies in our every day work. First of all, nowadays most employees use word processing and spreadsheets in their work. As a result, such way of doing things allows to save time and papers. Instead of using new papers every time you only need to change an electronic document and send it to a printer. The second point is that increasing speed of the Internet created new kind of work called telecommuting. Today many people all over the world work from their houses using computers and the Internet and they don’t waste of time to get to an office. Moreover, telecommuting gives opportunity to be freelancer and have several employers. Thirdly, more and more people use online ticketing and reservation. E-commerce provide us insight into practically all area of our life.

              On the other hand, there are a few obvious disadvantages of development of information technologies. Firstly, acceleration of computer technologies leds to unemployment. Computers can do work instead of people and employers have to reallocate workforce. Secondly, e-commerce causes the new kind of offences. It is so-called e-crime. Criminals use the Internet to access the commerce information about credit cards and accounts. The third point is that people while their working have to spend much more time in front of computers. As a result, it can cause decline of eyesight and posture.

              In conclusion, I strongly believe that computers brought us more advantages than disadvantages. We should use all power of information technologies for progress of humanity.
              MODL ASCO Code - 2231-79(C# программист)
              IELTS L6.0 R4.0 W5.5 S6.0 over 5.5 (23 January 2010)
              IELTS L5.5 R6.0 W6.5 S7.0 over 6.5 (17 April 2010)
              IELTS L6.5 R6.5 W6.0 S6.5 over 6.5 (17 July 2010) Ура!!!!!

              Comment


              • Скажите, пожалуйста!!!

                Что за проблемы у меня с райтингом не могу понять, везде пишут что главное это структура, слова связки и затем уже грамматика... Преподаватель хвалит мою структуру, связки хорошие, всякие обороты употребляю, стараюсь писать просто, но делаю несколько граматических ошибок в сочинении. преподаватель говорит что сочинение на 5 написано... в чем именно у меня проблема? если не сложно посмотрите и скажите что за беда такая....


                Every day traffic seems to get worse on our roads. How we can reduce the number of cars on our roads today? What alternatives can we offer to car drivers?

                There are a lot of modes of decreasing traffic on the roads. Even though one mode may present many challenges , overall others can be a very negative experience and have a very negative influence on car drivers.
                In my opinion, one way to deal with the traffic would be to improve public transport such as buses, trains, trams and metro. If public transport service were better, many people would not buy the cars and take public transport. Furthermore if road system, number of stops and speed of public transport are better, citizens will use it instead of going by theit own cars. So, influencing citizens through goverment advertising programms of public transport will decrease number of cars on roads and decrease time wasted on going by public transport.
                One final suggestion which would help enormously is to increase taxes for carowners. Even so, many driwers can be angry, the advantages far overweight the disadvantages. Many people are used to going by cars because sometimes it is easier. But through increasing the taxes we can force them to refuse of it. So, we can reduce the number of carowners and as a result decrease pollutting and infecting of environment and stop making urban smog.
                To sum up there are several measures which could be taken to decrease the number of cars. If the goverment and individuals alike were to help and to stop wasting time on road, pollutting and infecting envirinment it would make our public transport more comfortable and popular and it would stop using cars and traffic on roads.



                21.03.2009. 5.5/6/5.5/6 (6.0)

                Comment


                • Every day traffic seems to get worse on our roads. How we can reduce the number of cars on our roads today? What alternatives can we offer to car drivers?

                  There are a lot of (1) modes of (2) decreasing traffic on the roads. Even though one (3) mode may present many challenges , overall others can be a very negative experience and have a very negative influence on car drivers.
                  In my opinion, one way to deal with the traffic would be to improve public transport such as buses, trains, trams and metro. If public transport (4) service were better, many people would not buy (5) the cars and take public transport (6). Furthermore if (7) road system, number of stops and speed of public transport are better, citizens will use it instead of going by theit own cars. ( So, influencing citizens through (19) goverment advertising (9) programms of public transport will (10) decrease (11) number of cars on roads and (10) decrease time wasted on going by public transport.
                  One final suggestion which would help enormously is to increase taxes for (12) carowners. Even so, many driwers (13) can be angry, (14) the advantages far overweight the disadvantages. Many people are used to going (15) by cars because sometimes it is easier. But through (16) increasing the taxes we can force them to (17) refuse of it. So, we can reduce the number of (12) carowners and as a result (1 decrease pollutting and infecting of (21) environment and stop making urban smog.
                  To sum up there are several measures which could be taken to decrease the number of cars. If the (19) goverment and individuals alike were to help and to stop wasting time on (20) road, pollutting and (22) infecting (21) envirinment it would make our public transport more comfortable and popular and (23) it would stop using cars and traffic on roads.

                  (1) ways, not modes. Vy putaete s “modes of transportation”
                  (2) reducing, not decreasing
                  (3) see (1)
                  (4) “service” ne nado
                  (5) the ne nado
                  (6) “instead” nado. Inache znachenie: would not buy cars AND would NOT use public transport
                  (7) THE road system t.e. unikal’noe javlenie
                  ( Plohjoe predlozhenie. Nado perepisat’: The government through promoting public transport can reduce the number….????
                  (9) programmes! programs – amerikanskaja orfografija.
                  (10) reduce
                  (11) THE number of cars
                  (12) dva slova, ili cherez tire: car owners
                  (13) WILL be angry. Everybody “can” be angry from time to time, dazhe ja!
                  (14) as/because ???
                  (15) by CAR – edinstrvennoe chislo, takzhe by train, by bus, by boat etc.
                  (16) increased taxes
                  (17) to stop (it).
                  (1 decrease/reduce environmental pollution and urban smog???
                  (19) goverNment – orfografija!
                  (20) on THE road – universal’noe ponjatie
                  (21) THE environment
                  (22) “infecting the environment” – perevedite na russkij: infecirovat’ okruzhajuschuju sredu. Na ljubom jazyke eto zvuchit stranno. Infekcija – eto medicinskoe ponjatie.
                  (23) What is “it” that would stop using cars and would stop traffic on the roads? It would stop “us” using cars? Etot monstr nado perepisat’. Sdelajte sebe odolzhenie, dumajte jasno i pishite prosto, korotkimi predlozhenijami, i vsjo budet okej.

                  И еще совет: сдайте на права и погоняйте на би-би. Ваша точка зрения поменяется сразу, бьюсь об заклад!
                  Здесь небо ясно и яро, Здесь воздух чист и светел,
                  Тобой здесь дышит сам ветер, Команданте Че Гевара
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSRVtlTwFs8

                  Comment


                  • Спасибо огромное!!!! просто огромнейшее!!!
                    а почему слово mode нельзя употреблять? это ведь "способ"...

                    И еще скажите, пожалуйста, на 6 ведь не тянет?
                    знаю что нет)))



                    21.03.2009. 5.5/6/5.5/6 (6.0)

                    Comment


                    • Сообщение от furlong
                      а почему слово mode нельзя употреблять? это ведь "способ"...
                      Это, скорее, режим. В инструкциях к теле- и видеоаппаратуре используется.
                      Polluting с одной t
                      Вот это предложение вообще лучше бы переделать, иначе звучит, как приговор владельцам автомобилей, типа, расправимся с ними и природе полегчает: So, we can reduce the number of (12) carowners and as a result (1 decrease pollutting and infecting of (21) environment and stop making urban smog
                      можно переделать, например,
                      A decrease in the number of vehicles on the road could decrease environmental pollution and smog production.
                      Cashback

                      http://starthere.com.au/?refid=103728

                      Comment


                      • Это академ модуль? Таких текстов много в SciAm. Когда пытаюсь болтать на такие темы в клубе, получается нечасто.
                        Some say all wars are over, and I hope to God they are,
                        For you know full well they never were good for a Jaunting Car,
                        But peace and plenty - may they reign here both near and far.

                        Comment


                        • Koten'ka спасибо большое)))
                          Rosewell Да это академ.
                          и все таки сколько баллов скажите, пожалуйста?



                          21.03.2009. 5.5/6/5.5/6 (6.0)

                          Comment


                          • Сообщение от furlong
                            Koten'ka спасибо большое)))
                            Rosewell Да это академ.
                            и все таки сколько баллов скажите, пожалуйста?
                            я бы между 5тью и 6тью что-нибудь поставил. Проблема в том, что очень часто русские люди дословно переводят предложения и разговаривают точно также, в итоге получается такой русский английский язык, в реальности же сами нативы говорят совсем по другому, возьмите любую газету или журнал, да даже тексты из модуля Reading, попробуйте перенять их манеру письма, это сложно, но возможно. Также вы путаетесь в вокабуляре, то вы перечислено было mode, decreasing и тд. мне кажется это довольно серьезное упущение и за это могут баллов достаточно много снять. Но тут только практика поможет, там что успехов вам, надеюсь все получится!
                            -Мальчик,ты не туда идешь,зеленые огни в другой стороне. -Пофиг,-сказал мальчик,-я зажгу свои.(с)

                            Comment


                            • Спасибо огромное!!!



                              21.03.2009. 5.5/6/5.5/6 (6.0)

                              Comment


                              • Сообщение от Koten'ka
                                Сообщение от furlong
                                а почему слово mode нельзя употреблять? это ведь "способ"...
                                Это, скорее, режим. В инструкциях к теле- и видеоаппаратуре используется.
                                Polluting с одной t
                                Вот это предложение вообще лучше бы переделать, иначе звучит, как приговор владельцам автомобилей, типа, расправимся с ними и природе полегчает: So, we can reduce the number of (12) carowners and as a result (1 decrease pollutting and infecting of (21) environment and stop making urban smog
                                можно переделать, например,
                                A decrease in the number of vehicles on the road could decrease environmental pollution and smog production.
                                Вот, делаю домашнее задание. модуль академик, задание 1:
                                A graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.

                                Graph: X: bus/car/bike/foot, Y: % of total travellers

                                То есть, modes of transport - это виды - или способы (смотря в каком смысле) - автобусы, машины, пешком или на мотоцикле
                                Veni vidi vici

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X