Сообщение от Brumby
Посмотреть сообщение
Vanderley, смею вас побеспокоить еще раз!!! Если вас не затруднит взгляните на мое новое эссе. Все мои грамматические и содержательные ляпы будутпотом тщательно проработаны. Спасибо! И с наступающим!!!!!
The use of CCTV (close circuit television) cameras in streets, stations, shops and other public places has increased rapidly in recent years. Although we are told that these cameras help in the fight against crime, some people are opposed to their use. They believe that everyone has a right to privacy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays many societies face an escalation of crime rates and need to (I would not write have to. Cause they don't; it's not an obligation.)to invent new ways to protect people from becoming victims (people - plural, a victim - singular) . There is an opinion that cameras on _ (почему the? вы же не имеете в виду какие-то особые улицы) streets and in premises may make a difference and reduce violation. However, other people claim that these measures are bound to infringe people’s private rights.
Personally, I am inclined to believe that CCTV is an adequate option to fight against crime. Firstly, if cameras are installed on busy highways, reckless drivers will be discouraged from speeding and as a result the number of accidents is bound to reduce. Secondly, not only owners (but not buyers, I really doubt that buyers would really care) will not have to (just different order of the words) worry about having their goods stolen in shops if there is a camera in the hall , but also customers will feel more secure to know that this aria is free from pickpockets . Finally, the officials maintain that these measures of protection have considerable facilitated the job of investigators while tracking down perpetrators and proving their gilt in the court.
Nevertheless, the opponents of this view say that any kind of CCTV intrude on people’s private life. When people know that they are under scrutiny they cannot help thinking about being watched by strangers and this may cause nervous breakdowns. Moreover, as regards celebrities, they are those who seem to be at disadvantage the most as they may fall a victim to unscrupulous people who may sell the footage with famous people to journalists.
All things considered, I believe that the importance of maintaining security has precedence over anything else. Consequently, taking into consideration the effectiveness of CCTV in deterring the commission of offenses it is well worth putting up with some inconvenience it causes (or may cause ? I mean the purpose of the camera is not causing inconvenience).
The use of CCTV (close circuit television) cameras in streets, stations, shops and other public places has increased rapidly in recent years. Although we are told that these cameras help in the fight against crime, some people are opposed to their use. They believe that everyone has a right to privacy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays many societies face an escalation of crime rates and need to (I would not write have to. Cause they don't; it's not an obligation.)to invent new ways to protect people from becoming victims (people - plural, a victim - singular) . There is an opinion that cameras on _ (почему the? вы же не имеете в виду какие-то особые улицы) streets and in premises may make a difference and reduce violation. However, other people claim that these measures are bound to infringe people’s private rights.
Personally, I am inclined to believe that CCTV is an adequate option to fight against crime. Firstly, if cameras are installed on busy highways, reckless drivers will be discouraged from speeding and as a result the number of accidents is bound to reduce. Secondly, not only owners (but not buyers, I really doubt that buyers would really care) will not have to (just different order of the words) worry about having their goods stolen in shops if there is a camera in the hall , but also customers will feel more secure to know that this aria is free from pickpockets . Finally, the officials maintain that these measures of protection have considerable facilitated the job of investigators while tracking down perpetrators and proving their gilt in the court.
Nevertheless, the opponents of this view say that any kind of CCTV intrude on people’s private life. When people know that they are under scrutiny they cannot help thinking about being watched by strangers and this may cause nervous breakdowns. Moreover, as regards celebrities, they are those who seem to be at disadvantage the most as they may fall a victim to unscrupulous people who may sell the footage with famous people to journalists.
All things considered, I believe that the importance of maintaining security has precedence over anything else. Consequently, taking into consideration the effectiveness of CCTV in deterring the commission of offenses it is well worth putting up with some inconvenience it causes (or may cause ? I mean the purpose of the camera is not causing inconvenience).
there are a lot of words I didn't not, despite living in the US )
Comment