essay on experiments on animals
Some people think that scintists experimenting with animals in a laboratory is the only way we can guarantee new products will be save for human use. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is an opinion essay. My opinion is that although experiments on animals have alternatives, still they are the only reliable way to make sure new prosucts are safe.
Short plan:
Detailed plan:
Dozens of envention are made every day to improve current standards of living. To start producing a new product the company have to make sure that it is safe for human health. The most widespread way to achieve this goal is to conduct experiments on animals. Some people think that these experiments make animals suffer and therefore should be abolished. I think that although they are right from the ethical point of view, we do not have a viable alternative to replace them with.
Experiments on animals have been being conducted for more than a century. They have proven to be extremely helpful in testing new products because of the similarties between human's and animals's bodies. Moreover, since animals that normally participate in experiments are smaller than humans and thus they react much quicker to any side effects of the product, it is possible to faster spot the problems people may start experiencing only in a long run.
Despite the existance of such an effective method, there has been a series of attemts to find other methods of product testing. The one that appeared to be virtually as precise as experimenting on animal is computer testing. Indeed, modern software allows scientists to model extremally complex systems and simulate processes that happen in human body. Unfortunately, the problem with computer modelling is that scintists still do not completely know how human body operates, which is why computer methods cannot totally replace existing way of testing new products.
To sum up, I am convinced that experiments with animal is the most reliable way to ensure that the pruduct is safe for people. However, I believe that the development of medicine and computer technologies will lead to at least partial replacement of this cruel practise with computer testing.
Thanks for checking. Goran.
Some people think that scintists experimenting with animals in a laboratory is the only way we can guarantee new products will be save for human use. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is an opinion essay. My opinion is that although experiments on animals have alternatives, still they are the only reliable way to make sure new prosucts are safe.
Short plan:
- Intro. Experiments are cruel, but alternatives are not very reliable;
- 1st body paragraph. Experiments on animals are effective.
- 2nd body paragraph. Existing alternatives.
- Conclusion. So far experiments on animals are the only way to ensure ...
Detailed plan:
- Intro. Dozens of inventions everyday. → Ensure that they are safe before using them. → The most popular way so far → Ethical question. → My opinion.
- 1st body paragraph. Experiments on animals are conducted for more than a 100 years. → Similarity in body structure. → Quicker reactions of body(mice). → Previous reasons make them effective.
- 2nd body paragraph. Attempts to finds a viable alternative. → Computer modelling. → Capabilities of modern computers. → Drawbacks – precision in modelling, lack of knowledge of how our body functions.
- Conclusion. We should continue experimenting. → We should develop other methods to replace existing.
Dozens of envention are made every day to improve current standards of living. To start producing a new product the company have to make sure that it is safe for human health. The most widespread way to achieve this goal is to conduct experiments on animals. Some people think that these experiments make animals suffer and therefore should be abolished. I think that although they are right from the ethical point of view, we do not have a viable alternative to replace them with.
Experiments on animals have been being conducted for more than a century. They have proven to be extremely helpful in testing new products because of the similarties between human's and animals's bodies. Moreover, since animals that normally participate in experiments are smaller than humans and thus they react much quicker to any side effects of the product, it is possible to faster spot the problems people may start experiencing only in a long run.
Despite the existance of such an effective method, there has been a series of attemts to find other methods of product testing. The one that appeared to be virtually as precise as experimenting on animal is computer testing. Indeed, modern software allows scientists to model extremally complex systems and simulate processes that happen in human body. Unfortunately, the problem with computer modelling is that scintists still do not completely know how human body operates, which is why computer methods cannot totally replace existing way of testing new products.
To sum up, I am convinced that experiments with animal is the most reliable way to ensure that the pruduct is safe for people. However, I believe that the development of medicine and computer technologies will lead to at least partial replacement of this cruel practise with computer testing.
Thanks for checking. Goran.
Comment