Plz check this essay, if you will have a spare minute. Any general advice is higly appreciated.
Even though globalization affect the world's economics in a very positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten. Discuss.
In this day and age culturural, religion and national boundaries are fading. Not only this process is beneficial for world economy and overall standarts of living but it even creates new, advanced civilization, that shares all of the intellectual achievements humanity made so far. On the other side of the coin, however, unifying human race may be harmfull for some cultures, destroying their unique characteristics and endanger local businesses that are unable to compete worldwide. In my opinion globalisation is the future of humankind.
At first glance, saving own national identity should be one of the main priorities for any country. To begin with, customs and history, language and architectural wonders these all leaves their mark in the heart of any citizen. Secondly, there are obvious economic advantages of closed business model. Local industries and manufacturers can not only satisfy needs of customers in the best possible way, knowing each and every specific demand, but also their income benefits to the local population in form of taxes. And last but not least is the unique way in which people of different beliefs look at the world. Only because of those uneven background we have Tolsoy's books and Shakespeare's plays which are similar and yet so distinguishable individual.
Nevertheless, a thorough analysis identifies a range of globalization positive sides. First of all, it is ongoing process from the dawn of times. During the whole known history people desire to unite creating more and more coplex structures to satisfy that need. Tribes, kingdoms alliances and unions these all are different ways of cooperation. Therefore, globalization is just a question of scale. Furthermore, wars and suffering, hunger and poverty of millions of people can be ended with just or at least optimal resources distribution. It may be possible with the help of world goverment that rules without descrimination or beneficiaries.
Once again, unique perks of each country are worth saving. Nonetheless, all things considered, i am inclined to belive that globalization is only right thing to do in the long run.
338 words, 38 minutes.
Even though globalization affect the world's economics in a very positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten. Discuss.
In this day and age culturural, religion and national boundaries are fading. Not only this process is beneficial for world economy and overall standarts of living but it even creates new, advanced civilization, that shares all of the intellectual achievements humanity made so far. On the other side of the coin, however, unifying human race may be harmfull for some cultures, destroying their unique characteristics and endanger local businesses that are unable to compete worldwide. In my opinion globalisation is the future of humankind.
At first glance, saving own national identity should be one of the main priorities for any country. To begin with, customs and history, language and architectural wonders these all leaves their mark in the heart of any citizen. Secondly, there are obvious economic advantages of closed business model. Local industries and manufacturers can not only satisfy needs of customers in the best possible way, knowing each and every specific demand, but also their income benefits to the local population in form of taxes. And last but not least is the unique way in which people of different beliefs look at the world. Only because of those uneven background we have Tolsoy's books and Shakespeare's plays which are similar and yet so distinguishable individual.
Nevertheless, a thorough analysis identifies a range of globalization positive sides. First of all, it is ongoing process from the dawn of times. During the whole known history people desire to unite creating more and more coplex structures to satisfy that need. Tribes, kingdoms alliances and unions these all are different ways of cooperation. Therefore, globalization is just a question of scale. Furthermore, wars and suffering, hunger and poverty of millions of people can be ended with just or at least optimal resources distribution. It may be possible with the help of world goverment that rules without descrimination or beneficiaries.
Once again, unique perks of each country are worth saving. Nonetheless, all things considered, i am inclined to belive that globalization is only right thing to do in the long run.
338 words, 38 minutes.
Comment