Tweet
Покритикуйте, пож-та, эссе...
Написано минут за 30 без единой готовой идеи - так как мне пришлось бы писать на экзамене.
Самое главное, что поняла, что за 40 минут могу всякую ерунду на 250 слов написать
Дело за "малым" - оцените, плиз, содержание...
Ну и всякие другие комментарии тоже приветствуются!
Тема взята из отчетов о прошедших экзаменах, звучит так:
Nowadays universities are offering a wide range of programmes for students to take. Some believe that the students should themselves choose the subjects they are going to study. Others, on the other hand, consider that it is the government responsibility to determine the content of the course. There is a number of arguments behind both of the opinions.
First of all, the supporters of the idea that students should choose the curriculum believe that when students have an opportunity to decide the content of the course they tend to take the subjects they like. This results in better academic achievements as young people are more eager to study the topics which are more interesting for them.
Secondly, the students in college are well aware of the employment situation and job requirements in the sphere they are going to choose. Thus, they take the subjects that are really necessary for their future career which leads to better job prospects in future.
However, the opponents of this idea argue that government should decide the syllabus of each course for several reasons.
To begin with, there are special curriculum standards for each profession which have to be met by the educational institution. this can be achieved only when the programmes are established by a governmetn body.
Moreover, standard syllabus prepared by the authorities is more academic and provides students with better education, which gives them additional advantage in finding a better job.
To summarize, although there are two opinions on the topic discussed, the best solution will be for the government to set the syllabus of the couse and make a list of addiitonal subjects students can choose from.
Заранее спасибо!
Написано минут за 30 без единой готовой идеи - так как мне пришлось бы писать на экзамене.
Самое главное, что поняла, что за 40 минут могу всякую ерунду на 250 слов написать
Дело за "малым" - оцените, плиз, содержание... Ну и всякие другие комментарии тоже приветствуются!
Тема взята из отчетов о прошедших экзаменах, звучит так:
Некоторые люди считают, что государство должно решать, какие именно предметы изучать студентам в университетах. Другие люи верят, что лучше бы студенты сами выбирали, что им учить. Рассмотрите аргументы за и против
First of all, the supporters of the idea that students should choose the curriculum believe that when students have an opportunity to decide the content of the course they tend to take the subjects they like. This results in better academic achievements as young people are more eager to study the topics which are more interesting for them.
Secondly, the students in college are well aware of the employment situation and job requirements in the sphere they are going to choose. Thus, they take the subjects that are really necessary for their future career which leads to better job prospects in future.
However, the opponents of this idea argue that government should decide the syllabus of each course for several reasons.
To begin with, there are special curriculum standards for each profession which have to be met by the educational institution. this can be achieved only when the programmes are established by a governmetn body.
Moreover, standard syllabus prepared by the authorities is more academic and provides students with better education, which gives them additional advantage in finding a better job.
To summarize, although there are two opinions on the topic discussed, the best solution will be for the government to set the syllabus of the couse and make a list of addiitonal subjects students can choose from.
Заранее спасибо!
Comment