Сообщение от Alexander Usov
Посмотреть сообщение
Topic: Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but (1) not poor alternatives to a natural environment. Discuss some of the arguments for and/or against keeping animals in zoos.
I think that the question about whether animals (2) should keep in zoos is (3) the one that is rather controversial and open for debate. Some people believe that zoos play (4) very important role in (5) social’s life. However other people are against (6) of zoos because (7) of cruel towards wild animals. In this essay I will discuss these ( point of view and present my view in (9) favor (10) people who believe that zoos are not necessary.
(11) From the one hand, there are many benefits in keeping animals in zoos. The most obvious advantage of (12) it is that zoos take part in breeding endangered species. Last decades bring us many environmental issues (13) as a result of deforestation. So many (14) kind of animals have lost their natural habitat and are at the edge of extinction. In connection with these challenges many zoos have special conservation programs for (15) mentioned above species. In addition to these practical benefits zoos are used for educational purposes. Take for example the fact that children have great opportunity to watch wild animals such as bears, horses, monkeys and tigers alive. Apparently, they can gain much more new knowledge and experience this way than (16) in usual classes.
On the other hand, there are many disadvantages when animals (17) have to live in zoos. First of all, keeping animals in zoos (1 are not humane. There is no doubt that wild animals as well as any (19) alive creatures need freedom and (20) enough private room. All animals want to be (21) close to natural environment. People don’t have any moral right to deprive animals of their freedom (22) . Furthermore, animals are not toys in human’s arms and zoos (23) can’t be a place for entertainments. Think about a (24) white bear that have to be in a cage while (25) the temperature of the environmental air is +25C.
Taking into account everything mentioned above, personally I am sure that zoos will not have (26) place in the future.
(1) not – ne nado
(2) should be kept
(3) the one that is – ne nado
(4) “a” – nado
(5) social life. Our social life? Some animals are social creatures. They may also have a social life.
(6) of – ne nado
(7) because they are cruel towards wild animals?
( points of view
(9) favour – v Britanii i Avstralii
(10) in favour OF THE people – slova posle “who” delajut “people” opredeljonnymi, znachit nado “the people”
(11) ON the one hand
(12) of THEM, ie zoos?
(13) as a result of = caused by. Luchshe?
(14) kinds
(15) the – nado, t.k. they are mentioned above, t.e. ponjatno kakie. Luchshe: the species mentioned above.
(16) in usual classes = in class. Luchshe?
(17) Nado po-sil’nee: when animals are MADE to live in a zoo.
(1 IS not humane
(19) living creatures
(20) enough room to move around. - I don’t think many of them care about “privacy” as much.
(21) to be IN their natural environment?
(22) Exclamation sign!!! Here, here! Preach it, brother!
(23) “shouldn’t be” ?– because not only they can but they ARE places of entertainment now.
(24) You mean Polar bear – but I see what you mean.
(25) the temperature outside is +25C.
(26) a place in the future = have no future. Luchshe?
Horoshee esse, hotja ja ne vo vsjom razdeljaju tvoju tochku zrenija. I live near Regents Park where London Zoo is. I have been many times and can vouch the animals there look very happy. So are the kids!
Comment